Continue vs Floot — compare Programming tools: pricing, rating, and features.
Who wins? Click the side you support to cast your vote.
| Category | Programming | Programming |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Rating | 4.5 | — |
| Features | Open-source AI coding assistant. Use any LLM, works offline, no telemetry. open sourceIDEAIprivacy | Build serious apps without coding in minutes. 编程建站低代码 |
Continue
Input: N/A (self-hosted; user bears LLM cost)
Output: N/A (self-hosted; user bears LLM cost)
Floot
Input: N/A (not clearly public)
Output: N/A (not clearly public)
Subscription:Tool 1: Free (self-hosted; user covers LLM costs). Tool 2: Freemium (free tier + paid plans; pricing not detailed).
Latency / TTFT:Tool 1: Varies by self-hosted LLM; offline use may increase latency. Tool 2: Web-based; likely low latency but unspecified.
Multimodal & ecosystem:Tool 1: Rich plugin/integration ecosystem via VS Code and open-source extensions; supports multiple LLMs. Tool 2: Limited public details on plugins; likely web-based app builder integrations.
Privacy & compliance:Tool 1: No telemetry; offline use. Tool 2: Unclear data handling; likely standard SaaS compliance (e.g., GDPR) but not verified.
Choose Tool 1 (Continue) if you need a self-hosted, privacy-focused coding assistant with full control over LLMs. Choose Tool 2 (Floot) if you want a no-code app builder with minimal programming effort.